Imam ul Haq and Ahmed Shehzad clash in fiery debate over Babar Azam

Pakistan cricketers Imam ul Haq and Ahmed Shehzad ignited a fiery exchange over the selection process of the Pakistan cricket team and the captaincy reign of Babar Azam.

The discussion escalated when Shehzad alleged that Azam favored certain players in team selection, overlooking meritocracy.

Shehzad's claims suggested that Azam's preferences dictated team composition, leading to the exclusion of deserving players. He further criticized the trend of senior players consistently making the playing XI, hindering opportunities for younger talents. Shehzad emphasized the importance of performance in major tournaments, highlighting Pakistan's drought in ICC events since the Champions Trophy.

Moreover, the opening batter questioned the reappointment of Babar Azam as captain over Shaheen Afridi, insinuating unfairness in the decision-making process. He also raised eyebrows by alleging a clique within the team orchestrating social media campaigns to bolster their image.

In response, Imam ul Haq defended Azam's captaincy, attributing his reinstatement to the cricket board's decision rather than personal choice. He refuted Shehzad's assertions by pointing out Pakistan's notable performances in recent T20 World Cups, implying team cohesion and competence.

The debate intensified as Shehzad challenged Imam's loyalty to Azam, insinuating contractual obligations influencing his stance. However, Imam dismissed these insinuations, urging Shehzad to address concerns during his active playing career rather than post-retirement.

The discussion took an intriguing turn when the host intervened, questioning how players critical of Azam still found a place in the squad. Shehzad justified their inclusion by citing under-performance of favored players and personal connections with higher authorities.